every now and then a movie will be so good visually and thematically it’ll make me clap and smile or tear-up because everything just worked. great story (and very likely a happy ending in my case) and great lighting, most importantly, go a long way with me. honestly, even if the movie didn’t have a happy ending, if the lighting was amazing, i’d still remember it. i’m drawn to the ones with the “beautiful light.” (but of course. said with the finest french accent. but of course.) i just finished watching midnight in paris, the woody allen film. beautifully lit. and i’d been meaning to speak about my love affair with great light . . .
i had to pause the movie so that i could make a few notes for this blog.
my love of that beautiful hollywood light and still photography happily met one day on a large movie set in kuuloa ranch. though, not in that order. as i’d mentioned in a previous post i was a paramedic. for extra money, a lot of part-time paramedics would work special events: rock concerts, escorting heads of state (a crown prince, once) and feature film productions. all of those were the good medical details.
once i went part-time, i hate to say this, i was lucky enough to get any of those details. because of my interest in film and photography, working those movie productions, was ideal.
on set, i’d keep my eyes on a few key people: camera department, lighting, director of photography, grips and the gaffer. the gaffer. my hero. the name (the first one i’d met told me this) comes from the days when a gaffer used a gaff (a long rod with a hook at one end) to move the lights, up high, around the set. and the name stuck, apparently. works for me.
i learned to spot the gaffer right off so that i could see how he worked and what his concerns were (at a respectable distance, of course). outside, when light from the sky mattered, the gaffer would be the one looking up through a small handheld piece of welder’s glass, looking for breaks in clouds and such. find the carts with all of the rolls of different colored film gels and large lights, find the gaffer. if those clouds decided to stay, and the shots planned for that day called for beautiful golden late afternoon light . . . gaffer.
at the time, for the novice eye i still had, i had little clue what they were doing but remembered nearly everything, asking one of the assistants (or best boy) about something if i couldn’t work it out in my head. i had to remember because i needed to know how their setup affected the picture when the movie finally came out. i could recall how shots were lit, what gels they’d used and finally see the beautiful work on the screen. sure, there was post-processing but i could still see what made what, why that did that, and how it all came together into a beautiful visual.
and don’t forget, most feature films still shoot with film. good old film but that’s probably a blog that would NOT get written, at least not soon. shooting film back then lead me to buy a color meter, which, like the film blog, is a story for another not-to-be written blog.
i have a stack of books on lighting i’ve read but i think i learned the most on those movie sets. and from what i saw the gaffer do. if i didn’t love still photography so much can you guess what movie job i’d want? . . .
you probably guessed it. yep, director.

from top left to bottom right: 50-first dates, tears of the sun, the rundown, windtalkers, 50-first dates, the rundown, 50-first dates, tears of the sun, windtalkers, windtalkers, 50-first dates, 50-first dates.